9 Qualities of Biblical Manhood and Womanhood

It’s my week to post on the Engage (bible.org) women’s leadership blog. Here’s my entry for yesterday:

More than 35 years ago when I started dating a guy named Gary Glahn, he liked to grow bonsai trees and cacti. For my high school graduation, he sewed us matching down vests—that we still wear—from a kit. During my freshman year of college, he drew me a rose and shaded it perfectly with colored pencils. I hung it on the wall in my dorm. His plant growing, his sewing skills, and his drawing all got him labeled as a sissy.

One of my introverted male students told of a time when he visited a church for the first time. He wanted to sit back, observe, and get a feel for whether this place might be a good fit for his gifts. During the adult Bible fellowship, the larger group divided up into smaller groups, and he ended up as the lone male with a few women who were regular attenders. These women handed him the teaching guide and expected him to lead the discussion. He was mortified that they deemed adhering to strict gender roles more important than making him feel welcome and comfortable as a guest–not to mention checking out his theology.

A former fellow employee is a single guy who’s an artist. An introvert, he dislikes sports and prefers to create. People ask him if he’s gay. He’s not.

When my husband goes to Kenya, he sees women thatching the roofs of huts. In parts of Africa, thatching rooftops is “women’s work.” But in America, people often describe a female roofer as “doing a man’s job.”

Among American married couples, the husband may drive the car because he’s the guy taking the lead. In some countries, the wife drives because she’s taking on the servant’s role.

Some years back, a deacon at a church we attended filed for bankruptcy. This man had a nice pool in his yard. The leaders told him they didn’t want him to file. Instead, they wanted to take up an offering, organize garage sales, and come up with all manner of creative ways to help him pay his debts so that the name of Christ would not be slandered. He refused. So the church asked him to step down until he could get a grip on his finances. He argued, “If a guy can’t lead, there’s nowhere for him to serve.” So he left.

I sit on the fence between introvert and extravert. One of my spiritual gifts is teaching. But my husband is definitely an introvert, and his gifts lie in administration. I usually find myself in front of a crowd; he heads for the accounting office. In the first years of our marriage, people assumed we suffered from role reversal…that I “wore the pants in the family.” After all, they reasoned, he was supposed to be visible, and I was supposed to be invisible.

Each of these anecdotes reflects a distorted view of gender. What people (especially middle-class, American evangelicals) have failed to take into account in each case is that when we put men and women in boxes according to narrowly defined definitions of masculinity and femininity, we deny the full and dynamic range of the personhood God created. Yes, men and women are different. But the moment we insist on how our sex differences must work themselves out socially—saying things like “women are more emotional,” “men are more detached,” “women need love,” and “men need respect”—we stuff people into boxes. Our theology should be broad enough to consider normal the relatively unemotional woman and the man who desires affection more than respect —or any cultural variation of gender role outside the USA. If it’s biblical, it’s global.

The way to become our most fully flourishing male and female selves is not for women to wear frilly clothes and men to fart, grill steaks, rescue damsels, kill Bambi, and retreat to their man-caves—despite what Christian books on gender might suggest.

Interestingly, the Bible never outlines what feminine and masculine behavior looks like. Jesus cooks; Jael wields a tent peg; Paul weeps; Miriam prophesies. Indeed, the Bible includes no exhortations to pursue manhood and womanhood. Rather, the apostles and prophets focus on something else: the fruit of the Spirit 1– love; 2–joy; 3–peace; 4–patience; 5–goodness; 6–kindness; 7–gentleness; 8–faithfulness; and 9–self-control. And experience tells me that the more someone pursues Christlikeness, the more fully he or she flourishes as a man or as a woman.

Our fully actualized masculine and feminine selves develop as by-products of our spiritually developing selves. If we make it our goal to be masculine or feminine, we miss Christlikeness. If we set our focus on being like Christ, we discover to our delight that we become the men and women God created us to be.

Join the discussion 3 Comments

  • Leon says:

    most emphatically agree and I am a whole masculine man. We need these true and meek voices in the churches today. Also for all society to understand of the perfect nature of Jesus’ love. without regard to gender. I will stop short of allowing the conflicting and distorted sexual orientation basis for gender. if homosexuals or various other “genders” are allowed to have an authority role in the churches then God will bring his wrath upon all society and the church, too. The sexually oriented genders are an abomination to God.

  • Teri Gasser says:

    This reminded me of a discussion my husband & I had before we were married, “Who do you think should pay bill and over see finances in a home?” He asked me.
    Having grown up in a home where my mom was a professional bookkeeper and took care of family finances my response was, “Whoever does it best”
    “I think the husband should,” was his reply.
    “As long as the bills are paid that’s fine.” I responded.
    So for many years he took care of that now I do. He still does our taxes for which I am eternally grateful.
    Also I taught my hubby how to start charcoal and grill meat.
    The clear guideline for manhood is to be a wise and loving leader. Wise is the man that plays his wife’s strengths. Wise is the woman who dwells under his protection of authority.

  • Bev Murrill says:

    This is a really good post; thanks Sandra. It cannot be that women and men are judged, evaluated and assigned roles according to their plumbing. God created some to be leaders, maybe 10% of the populations. He doesn’t seem to have been all that concerned about their plumbing – as you said Jesus prayed, Jael drove a tent peg into the enemy’s temple… Jael’s husband was in relationship with Sisera and his cohorts yet no one seems to have a problem that she killed her husband’s mate! I don’t see anyone saying she should have operated under her husband’s authority in that case… and in many others, including Abigail.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: